Black Politics Now
  • Home
  • Business
  • Civil Rights
  • Criminal Justice
  • Education
  • Elections
  • Health
  • Policy
  • Reparations
  • Voter Rights
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
Black Politics Now
  • Home
  • Business
  • Civil Rights
  • Criminal Justice
  • Education
  • Elections
  • Health
  • Policy
  • Reparations
  • Voter Rights
No Result
View All Result
Black Politics Now
No Result
View All Result

Black voters join the DOJ’s lawsuit against the Houston County elections board

Black Politics Now by Black Politics Now
March 9, 2025
in Voter Rights
0
Grant Blankenship/GPB News

Grant Blankenship/GPB News

74
SHARES
1.2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

March 9, 2025 Story by: Editor

You might also like

Federal court won’t revisit ruling that weakens the Voting Rights Act in 7 states

Tarrant County hires law firm to defend redistricting map

Justice Department opposes ‘pre-clearance request’ in Alabama redistricting case

Two Black voters have joined the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) lawsuit against the elections chair of Houston County, aiming to alter the county’s election system. The lawsuit, initially filed by the DOJ on January 16 against Houston County and its commissioners—Dan Perdue, Shane Gottwals, Gail Robinson, Tal Talton, and Mark Byrd—was updated on Tuesday to include the two voters, according to court records.

The lawsuit contends that Houston County’s current election process “dilutes the voting strength of Black citizens,” thereby violating the Voting Rights Act. On January 25, county residents Courtney Driver and Mike Jones requested to participate in the case, and federal Judge Marc Treadwell granted their request on Tuesday.

“The Court finds that Driver and Jones seek to offer evidence that could shed a different light on issues before this Court,” Treadwell ruled.

Following their formal inclusion in the case, Driver and Jones expanded the lawsuit by also suing the Houston County Board of Elections and its chair, Pamela Morgan. In their complaint, the two plaintiffs proposed additional measures to address what they claim are the county’s electoral deficiencies. They also cited a “history of discrimination that extends beyond Houston County,” according to court records.

Proposed Solutions to Alleged Voting Issues

Driver and Jones have suggested several reforms to Houston County’s voting system, including:

  • Cumulative voting – allowing voters to allocate multiple votes to a single candidate.
  • Limited voting – restricting the number of candidates a voter can select.
  • Ranked-choice voting – enabling voters to rank candidates in order of preference.

Their participation in the case comes at a time when concerns are growing over the future of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, which was frozen early in President Donald Trump’s most recent term, court records indicate.

According to the records, “(Driver and Jones) are prepared to litigate this case expeditiously and seek no delay. They merely seek to protect the rights of Black voters in Houston County.”

Like the DOJ, Driver, and Jones are asking a federal judge to declare that Houston County’s election system violates the Voting Rights Act and to prevent the county from conducting future elections under its current structure until a compliant system is implemented. The two plaintiffs are represented by attorneys Bryan Sells and Lynsey Barron.

DOJ’s Lawsuit Against Houston County

The DOJ filed its lawsuit against Houston County’s election board, citing that despite an increase in the Black population, “Black-preferred candidates (that) have run for the Board of Commissioners … have routinely lost.”

The lawsuit highlights that Houston County’s Black and white communities are geographically and socially distinct, with Black residents primarily residing in northern and eastern Warner Robins. Churches and other community institutions also reflect this racial divide, the DOJ stated in its filing.

Houston County’s Population and Voting Trends

As of 2023, the U.S. Census estimates Houston County’s population at 171,974. Approximately 105,000 residents are active registered voters, with around 55% identifying as white and nearly 30% as Black. The DOJ claims that white voters “turn out to vote at significantly higher rates than Black registered voters” in the county.

However, the DOJ argues that the Black community is “sufficiently numerous and geographically compact” to form a majority voting bloc in a single-member district under a revised election plan. Driver and Jones support this assessment, according to court documents.

The DOJ proposes that redistricting could create a majority-Black district encompassing neighborhoods in northern and eastern Warner Robins, as well as apartment complexes along Carl Vinson Parkway. The plan could also include racially diverse areas in southern Warner Robins, ensuring that “Black voters would have the opportunity to elect their preferred candidates in elections conducted solely within the boundaries of such a district,” the DOJ stated.

Additionally, the DOJ noted that Houston County has a history of racial discrimination affecting Black residents’ access to education, healthcare, and employment—factors that “hinder(s) the ability of Black residents to participate effectively in the political process.” The agency warned that unless changes are made, the county’s current election system will continue to violate the Voting Rights Act.

Houston County’s Response

On December 19, the DOJ informed Houston County that it had conducted a multi-year investigation into possible Voting Rights Act violations and requested a response within two weeks, according to county attorney Bryan Tyson. However, Tyson stated that no one from the DOJ had reached out to local government officials during the investigation.

Houston County officials requested additional details and met with DOJ representatives on January 8 to discuss the allegations. The DOJ subsequently filed the lawsuit on January 16.

“Houston County will always follow the law,” Tyson stated. “At this time, Houston County is continuing to investigate the allegations made by the DOJ and determine whether the evidence supports those allegations. We will also continue to speak with members of the community about DOJ’s claims. Importantly, the DOJ lawsuit does not contain any allegations of intentional racial discrimination in Houston County.”

Tyson added that while the DOJ rushed to file the lawsuit before the change in presidential administration, the county believed it was necessary to conduct a thorough review before responding.

“We did not feel it would be prudent to respond in fewer than 30 days to a multi-year investigation, especially before we were able to obtain and review all of the relevant evidence,” Tyson said.

He further noted, “If we determine if we agree with the DOJ regarding a possible violation of the Voting Rights Act after reviewing all of the documents and evidence, we will take appropriate action at that time.”

Source: The Telegraph 

Tags: Black voters challenge election policiesBlack voters join Houston County voting lawsuitDOJ and Black voters fight election lawDOJ lawsuit against Houston County elections boardVoting rights case in Houston County
Share30Tweet19
Black Politics Now

Black Politics Now

Recommended For You

Federal court won’t revisit ruling that weakens the Voting Rights Act in 7 states

by Black Politics Now
July 4, 2025
0
North Dakota ruling blocks private suits under Voting Rights Act in 7 states

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has declined to revisit a decision that bars private individuals and groups from suing to enforce Section 2 of the Voting...

Read moreDetails

Tarrant County hires law firm to defend redistricting map

by Black Politics Now
July 2, 2025
0
Tarrant County Commissioners to vote on redistricting plan on Tuesday

Tarrant County commissioners have approved a $250,000 contract with the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) to defend the county's recently adopted redistricting map against a lawsuit alleging racial...

Read moreDetails

Justice Department opposes ‘pre-clearance request’ in Alabama redistricting case

by Black Politics Now
July 1, 2025
0
The U.S. Department of Justice in Washington has announced that three men affiliated with white supremacist groups have been sentenced for their plans to target an energy facility in the northwestern United States, according to prosecutors. Credit: Sarah Silbiger for The New York Times.

The U.S. Department of Justice has lodged a statement of interest in the ongoing Alabama redistricting lawsuit—Milligan v. Allen—in the Northern District of Alabama.

Read moreDetails

Witnesses testify about Black communities split in NC redistricting plans

by Black Politics Now
June 18, 2025
0
Federal trial set to challenge North Carolina election maps

Before a three-judge panel, witnesses testified that the Republican-drawn 2023 redistricting maps fractured Black communities across North Carolina, weakening their political voice and violating the Voting Rights Act.

Read moreDetails

New Jersey assembly committee advances ‘John R. Lewis Voter Empowerment Act’ to safeguard voting rights

by Black Politics Now
June 18, 2025
0
New Jersey assembly committee advances ‘John R. Lewis Voter Empowerment Act’ to safeguard voting rights

A bipartisan Assembly committee has taken a decisive step toward bolstering electoral protections in New Jersey by advancing A4083, known as the John R. Lewis Voter Empowerment Act.

Read moreDetails
Next Post
Image Source: AP Photos

What is Bloody Sunday?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ADVERTISEMENT

Related News

A Louisiana State Police trooper's sleeve patch is pictured in 2021. (Allen G. Breed/AP)

DOJ civil rights investigation finds pattern of excessive force by Louisiana State Police

May 21, 2025
Who Is Doris Miller, the first Black sailor to receive the Navy Cross for heroism at Pearl Harbor

Who Is Doris Miller, the first Black sailor to receive the Navy Cross for heroism at Pearl Harbor

July 7, 2025
Attendees listen during a rally supporting reparations for African Americans outside San Francisco City Hall on Tuesday, September 19, 2023. While some advocates feel the initial effort to deliver reparations to Black Californians fell short of expectations, the final decision will rest with voters in November. (Eric Risberg/AP Photo)

California slavery reparations bills unraveled over Gavin Newsom amendments

October 22, 2024
Black Politics Now

Get informed on African American politics with "Black Politics Now," your ultimate source for political engagement.

CATEGORIES

  • Business
  • Civil Rights
  • Congressional Black Caucus
  • Criminal Justice
  • Data
  • Department of Justice
  • Diversity Initiatives
  • Education
  • Elections
  • Enviroment
  • Equity
  • Hate Crimes
  • Health
  • Housing
  • Investigations
  • Legal Defense Fund
  • NAACP
  • Policy
  • Real Estate
  • Reparations
  • Research
  • Sports
  • State Issues
  • Study
  • Supreme Court
  • Technology
  • Voter Rights
  • World

Quick Link

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of service
  • Contact us

Download Our App

© 2024 Black Politics Now | All Right Reserved

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpChatIcon
wpChatIcon
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Business
  • Civil Rights
  • Criminal Justice
  • Education
  • Elections
  • Health
  • Policy
  • Reparations
  • Voter Rights
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart
SUBSCRIBE

© 2024 Black Politics Now | All Right Reserved

Join the Movement, Subscribe Now!(Don't worry, we'll never spam you!)

Don’t miss a beat—get the latest news, inspiring stories, and in-depth coverage of the issues that matter most to the Black community. Be part of the conversation and stay connected.

Enter your email address